We have tried 5 different scenarios:
We have optimized without and with net income contrains. The net income constrain was calculated per area as the mean net income for each discount rate across the 10 periods and the five scenarios.
The study area is located in Liperi and it contains 12 different areas.
[I will add here some description of the different areas]
Figure 1: The mean total wood volume production across the 12 areas
Main points:
Figure 2: Total wood production by area
Figure 3: Roundwood volume, the solid lines represent the mean values across the 12 study areas, and the shadowed areas represent the variation.
Main points:
Figure 4: Trends of roundwood volume per area with unconstrained net income
Figure 5: Trends of roundwood volume per area with constrained net income
Figure 6: Total mean carbon balance across the 12 areas and their variation
Figure 7: Carbon balance, the solid lines represent the mean values across the 12 study areas, and the shadowed areas represent the variation.
Figure 8: Trends of carbon balance per area with unconstrained net income
Figure 9: Trends of carbon balance per area with constrained net income
Here we are showing the carbon stock per ha of forest products, trees, and soil. The soil carbon ploted only includes the carbon from mineral soils and aerobic peat. Anaerobic peat was not plotted because their values are too big.
The 80% (I have to confirm this value) of the soil carbon is located in the anaerobic peat.
Figure 10: Mean carbon stock by scenario across the 12 areas.
Figure 11: Total mean net income across the 12 areas and their variation as the sum of all the net incomes obtained for each of the 10 periods.
Figure 12: Net income, the solid lines represent the mean values across the 12 study areas, and the shadowed areas represent the variation.
Figure 13: Net income per area with unconstrained net income
Figure 14: Net income per area with constrained net income
Figure 15: The mean and variation NPV across the 12 areas
Figure 16: Total mean clear felled area across the 12 areas and their variation as the sum of all the areas clearfelled in each of the 10 periods.
Figure 17: Clear felled area, the solid lines represent the mean values across the 12 study areas, and the shadowed areas represent the variation.
Figure 18: Clear felled area per area with unconstrained net income
Figure 19: Clear felled area per area with constrained net income
Figure 20: Mean value for the Shannon index per scenarion across the 12 areas and 10 periods.
Figure 21: Mean value for the Economically old forest index per scenario and across the 12 areas and 10 periods.
Figure 22: Mean broadleaves volume per scenario and across the 12 areas and 10 periods.
Figure 23: Mean dry biomass deadwood per scenario and across the 12 areas and 10 periods.
Figure 24: Comparison of the mean total values per ha scaled to values between 0 and 1, across the 12 areas (NPV 3%), Umconstrained.
Figure 25: Comparison of the values per area, NPV3% Unconstrained
Figure 26: Comparison of the values per area, NPV3% Constrained